[2023 kcdc] data leakage – why your ML model knows too much

Speaker: Leah Berg

For more, see the table of contents.


Notes

Data Leakage

  • Also known as leakage or target leakage
  • Different meaning for information security (data leaking to outside organization)
  • Can be difficult to spot
  • Training data includes info about test.
  • Model trained on info not available in production

How models learn

  • Split data into training data and test data.
  • Test data – data model has never seen before and makes sure model gets is right
  • Can also have an optional validation set
  • Randomly pick whether data points are training or test data. – Called random train/test split
  • More training data than test data

Don’t include data from the future

  • Using a random split of time series data doesn’t work because model has learned about future data.
  • Better to use a sliding window. Use first few months to predict next month. Then add that next value and predict one after. And keep going. Adding up error gives you accuracy of model.
  • This works because model only knows about data before one asked to predict.
  • Create timeline for when events happen. That way you make sure you aren’t using data from before the prediction
  • Don’t always know where/when data was created. Important to understand business process

Don’t randomly split groups

  • Have some data from the group you are then predicting
  • Problem when new student shows up so prediction will be bad
  • scikit-learn has GroupShuffleSplit() to get full group in same set – testing or training

Don’t forget your data is a snapshot

  • In school, have pristine data set.
  • In real world, data is always changing.
  • Could tell model about data that occurred after prediction. Again think about data on timeline

Don’t randomly split data when retraining

  • Want to use same training/test data on production and challenger models to see which better.
  • One has already seen data points during training that you are testing so you don’t know if it is better.
  • Challenger model can get more data that wasn’t available originally. Ok to split new data into test/train as long as original data part is split same way.

Split data immediately

  • Risky to rescale before split because data isn’t represented same way. Min/max can vary if split after
  • Run normalization on different sets of data
  • Before split, do analysis with business, exploratory data analysis. Split data before start modeling

Use Cross Validation

  • KFold Validation – split training data into K parts
  • ex: 3 fold validation – two parts stay as training and one is validation. The test data remains as test data and is kept separate for final evaluation.
  • The validation set is for an initial test.
  • Gives more options to train model

Be Skeptical of High Performance

  • If validation much higher than train/test, suspicious.
  • If train/test/validation sets are all high/the same, suspicious.

Use scikit-learn pipeline

  • Helps avoid leaking test data into training data

Check for features correlated with target

  • If another attribute has a high match with what looking for, make sure not mixing up correlation/causation.
  • Also, avoid timeline errors for reverse causation. Ex: the thing you are looking for causes, something else

My take

Great talk. Almost all of this was new to me. It was understandable and I learned a lot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *